Astral Entities VS Etheric Entities - Differences
Hello Dear Forum Members,
I would like to share my insights about the different kinds of entities.
1) Astral entities:
posses only astral body
cannot interact with matter (i.e. they do not cause skin tags like stigmata diabolis, granuloma, etc.)
do not react to physical counter-measures like salt, silver, light, flowing water, electrical earthing, smoke
can be embedded in music CDs, nutritional supplements, etc. When these items are exposed to light for example the spirits are unaffected.
excessive use of smartphones, watching spiritually devoid content on Netflix, living a mundane life all cause a spiritual emptiness in a human's soul that invites these entities in
can only tag in where there is a void or wound or trauma in you
one counter-measure that works is prayer to the divine
the cause personality disorders like narcissism, psychopathic personality disorder, etc.
can only syphon of energy through negative emotional state, because the astral body and the emotional body of a human seem to be the same thing. The astral body is connected to the etheric and physical body. There by feeling negative emotions one can experience pyhsical fatigue.
frequency and energetic counter-measurese like respectively Rife Machines and Turmaline gem stones probably do not work at all here, but it has to be clarified. Can narcissism be cured with a Rife Machine? Of course not.
2) Etheric entities:
posses astral and etheric body
interact with matter. They can cause skin tags. They sometimes cause an electrostatic-like sensation on the skin when moving around
are vulnerable to physical counter-measures like salt, electrical grounding, running water, light, sound frequencies, cloud busters, etc.
can brute force attack your aura even when 100% intact
they syphon of energy by tapping your etheric body directly and do not need to upset you emotionally at all
What do you think?
Best regards
Robert D.
I'll sum up very shortly conclusions from my observations:
energy can and do change (transform), e.g. from physical to etheric, from etheric to astral and so on, and in the opposite direction as well (I learnt that sticking to old hermetic idealistic views on the subjects, such as the concept of manifestation, is overly simplified and doesn't reflect actually what happens), and the process is about changing frequencies
there are entities who can do this at will, they even do not have to change their own frequencies to affect other (e.g. lower) frequencies, they can "produce" an energy on a different level than they exist, i.e. they are masters of energy manipulation
the physical world (energy "frozen" in the material form) such as ours is all about energy and mind manipulation, created for reincarnation system - again such as ours, controlled and manipulated, making an illusion of free will; the main goal for reincarnation system is to make a certain changes in psyche/consciousness in the incarnating people
the entire universe is about playing with consciousness, and all the endeavours that are taken (although we are basically unaware of this fact) could be summed up as changing, shifting to/from and manipulating consciousness
physical world could be in a way viewed as a trap - for consciousness, part of which is perception and memory
In the end, I'll again refer to what Robert Bruce wrote in his Astral Dynamics about the mind, which is objective point of reference. Keeping being objective and summing up the bare facts about the reality, without much philosophical or religious attachments, should lead to breakthroughs in discoveries about the knowledge and meta-knowledge of the universe on all levels. I think one of the biggest obstacles is that people keep believes "why" the system such as ours exists and why was created, or keeping strong believes on absolute things which we have no idea about at all, such as god (as a personal deity, often unconsciously personified in their minds in the way that simple people from the ancient and medieval era did), to me it is just a concept (i.e. should not be treated literally). The main obstacles include scientifically-oriented views and religiously-oriented views, in particular for the common esoteric fields uncritically believing in a variant of old Hindu karma and reincarnation concepts. I think that we can build up knowledge in many ways, using many paths, and not limiting ourselves to just one, which always would be a single-sided knowledge, e.g. uncritically believing in what perception brings to us (this includes naive approach to extra-sensory perception as well, which - to be brutal - never proved to be the ultimate source of references so far AFAIK, most often rather an effect of manipulation of the person; this includes very skillful clairvoyants in history) or, on the other hand, science in the current form.